Tags : :
The "Conditional Believer" will believe as long as it is expedient to them. What is expedient varies from believer to believer. To some, logic may be a condition of belief, others may require compassion, love, rationality etc. These believers usually require some kind of justification for their belief. When the conditions are no longer met, they discover that they never were met or the justification for their belief is no longer there, they may become disbelievers or claim "agnosticism". Agnosticism, however, has absolutely nothing to do with belief and is often used as a transitory label by those who are not ready to declare disbelief. In a very real way, we are all agnostics.
The "Unconditional Believer" is one who requires no conditions to be met. Arguing that their belief is illogical, irrational discompassionate or cruel does not work with the unconditional believer because none of these things are important in determining whether the person believes or not. These believers require no justification for their belief.
The "Unreasoned Disbeliever" is one who has never believed has not come in contact with evangelical believers and so may not know about how believers "feel". Having not experienced belief or its affects on a person, they may be amused or even perplexed by those who believe, especially the more evangelical ones. The unreasoned disbeliever is the main target for evangelical organisations such as the Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses. Since the unreasoned disbeliever has no experience of believers or belief, they are unaware of the dangers and pitfalls that a simple belief can present. Unreasoned disbelievers are still in the default state that we are all born into. Religion is a learned behaviour, we are not born with it or into it.
The "Reasoned Disbeliever", on the other hand is one who has experienced belief either first hand or through believers they have known. The reasoned disbeliever has reasoned through experience and/or observation and concluded that they are now a disbeliever or, as some prefer to call themselves a "non-believer". Reasoned disbelievers have usually been involved in some kind of religion and are often well versed in the scriptures, liturgy and outreach systems that religious organisations employ. It is for the reasoned disbeliever that organised religion reserves its most vehement condemnation. Those who have "seen the way" and rejected it are also those who have seen that "the way" is a figment of the imagination and, as such, present the biggest threat to a religion, its belief system and its converts. They have reasoned that belief is not for them and, in many cases, have seen that belief is damaging to those it affects. Having experienced first hand the pitfalls and dangers, not only to the spirit (personality) but also to the mental health of people, they are considered by some religious organisations to be "of the devil" or "lost". To win a reasoned disbeliever over is, indeed a great prize for a religion but not one easily won.
Of course, those four labels are just that - labels. Human beings are as diverse as they are numerous. Everyone is different and those for labels can be broken down to the Nth degree and combined, intermixed and dissected, added to in millions of ways. There are, for instance, "Reasoned Believers" who have studied and observed their existence, concluding that they are a believer. They have seen that their is something worth believing in. "Conditioned Believers" and "Conditioned Disbelievers" are those who have been "raised" or conditioned in particular proclivity. The list of labels can grow to be unmanageable.
What kind of Atheist or believer are you?
I would put myself in the "Reasoned Disbeliever" category in that I have been involved in a number of different Christian sects and reasoned that I did not believe any of them and, in the end, that I didn't believe in the root which they all hold true - the bible and God.